Buck Bravo

College Football News and Views

  • Feb
    25

    When navigating the blogosphere for stories about Big Ten football teams, you will shortly discover that teams such as Michigan and Ohio State have many more blogs following their programs.  Certain teams have disproportionately greater internet exposure.  So, is there any correlation between the number of blogs that follow a college football team and that team’s recruiting class rank?  Let’s find out.  

    In order to simplify the process, only the blogs that are in the Big Ten Bloggers Network and cover football were included in the analysis.  Team blog rankings were determined using total Google Page Rank.  Google developed Page Rank in order to measure the importance of a website.  While Page Rank can be inaccurate at times, it is the best measurement that is currently available.  For example, BuckBravo.com has a Google Page Rank of three.  Three is a decent rating, but some Big Ten Bloggers still do not consider BuckBravo.com worthy of a link on their page.  

    Sites marked with an asterisk recently changed their web addresses, and therefore old web address Page Ranks were used for the analysis:

    There is definitely an interesting correlation between number of Big Ten Blogger Blogs and 2009 recruiting class rankings.  Remember, Google Page Rank is an imperfect science.  Blogs such as Michigan’s MGOBLOG and Iowa’s Black Heart Gold Pants only have Page Ranks of three while I am certain that their daily traffic would warrant higher rankings.  Also, Wisconsin’s blog Bucky’s 5th Quarter is brand new and hasn’t had enough time to be ranked.  Despite a few irregularities, the numbers and Page Rankings of Big Ten Bloggers’ blogs are generally indicative of what level of talent each team recruited in 2009.  Here’s a list of the blogs from the analysis and their Google Page Rankings:

    Illinois

    Hail to the Orange* 4

    Indiana

    The Hoosier Report 4

    Iowa

    Black Heart Gold Pants 3

    Michigan

    Maize & Blue Nation 4

    Maize n Brew 4

    MGOBLOG 3

    Michigan Sports Center 3

    MVictors 3

    Varsity Blue 3

    Michigan State

    The Enlightened Spartan 3

    Ground Zero East Lansing 4

    Sparty MSU 4

    Minnesota

    Buck Bravo 3

    The Daily Gopher 4

    Golden Gopher Football Blog 3

    Northwestern

    Lake the Posts 4

    Ohio State

    Around the Oval 5

    Buckeye Commentary 3

    Buckeyes Daily 1

    Eleven Warriors 4

    Men of the Scarlet and Gray 3

    Our Honor Defend 4

    The Buckeye Battle Cry 4

    The Buckeye Blog 2

    Penn State

    Black Shoe Diaries 3

    There is No Name on My Jersey 4

    Happy Hour Valley 4

    Nittany White Out 3

    The Nittany Line 4

    Zombie Nation 4

    Purdue

    Boiled Sports 2

    Hammer and Rails* 4

    Wisconsin

    Bucky’s 5th Quarter 0

     

    3 Comments
  • Feb
    10

    The 2009 Big Ten class rankings for Rivals, Scout, and ESPN have been discussed and analyzed by many.  What has been frequently overlooked is the average quality of incoming classes.  Class rankings typically weigh both quantity and quality of recruits.  Let’s take a look at just the average quality of the incoming classes.

    Rivals uses two different scores for rating players.  First, let’s take a look at the average number of stars that have been awarded to recruits:

    Here’s a graph depicting the same data:


    Notice that the Big Ten teams are generally divided into three tiers.  The first tier of Ohio State, Michigan, and Michigan State are significantly higher than other teams yet progressively decrease sharply.  The second tiers of Illinois through Penn State are rather close in average quality.  The third tier, Indiana through Iowa, drops off sharply and teams progressively worsen from one to the next.

    Let’s take a look at the Rivals Rating average quality.  Rivals Rating is a more detailed score given to recruits that in theory is more accurate than stars:

    Here’s a graph for Rivals Rating averages:

    Once again, there are three distinct tiers.  However, the more detailed ratings has pushed Minnesota to the bottom of the top tier and rearranged a few of the other rankings.

    Scout.com uses a star system to rate recruits, and for the 2009 Big Ten classes the average star ratings for recruiting classes are as follows:


    Here’s a graph for the average Scout stars:

    Just as with both rating methods for Rivals, average quality using Scout stars yields three tiers for Big Ten teams.  Ohio State and Michigan still claim the top two spots, but Penn State has taken the third spot.  Minnesota through Wisconsin are very close to each other in the second tier.  Indiana through Iowa have established a fairly consistent bottom in the third tier.

    ESPN rates players on a numerical scale that ranges from about 40 to 100.  Note that ESPN does not assign a rating to JUCO transfers, which does affect the accuracy of the averages.  Here’s the average 2009 Big Ten recruiting class quality using ESPN ratings:

    Here’s a graph of the same ESPN rating averages:

    ESPN’s average ratings appear to follow a rather consistent linear regression.  Ohio State and Michigan are still head and shoulders above the rest of the Big Ten.  Just breaking the Big Ten into thirds in order to form tiers, Minnesota would be borderline first/second tier of the Big Ten.

    Having looked at the averages for these different rating systems, Minnesota appears to have one of the better classes in the Big Ten.  However Ohio State, Michigan, and Michigan State clearly have much better average ratings for their classes across the board.  A few years ago Minnesota was an annual cellar dweller when the Big Ten class rankings were released.  Keeping company with Illinois, Wisconsin, and Penn State in the recruiting battle should be encouraging for Gopher fans.  With a strong 2008 class and a solid 2009 class, if such recruiting efforts continue Minnesota should be fielding a team with upper level Big Ten physical talent within a few more years.

    Check back later this week for a breakdown of historical Big Ten recruiting class rankings and how those classes have predicted yearly performance.

    1 Comment
  • Feb
    4

    As of early this morning, the Gophers’ 2009 recruiting class is ranked 7th in the Big Ten. While middle of the pack for the Big Ten, it is the third best class of the last eight years for Minnesota:

    With last minute signings a sure bet in the Big Ten, where will they finish the day?

    1 Comment
Tip Jar

Advertise Here

To Advertise on BuckBravo.com email BuckBravo24 AT Hotmail.com

Search the Web